Plato vs. Nietzsche

insurrectionist Lee Plato versus Nietzsche The central ideas that two great philosophers, Plato and Friedrich Nietzsche, talked about were the naive realism and appearance and what they mainly focused on is where we as domain stand between these two. Of course, regarding the situation that Plato and Nietzsche springyd in opposite time periods, they had their differences that conflict with severally differents theories. But they do live with some function to agree upon they two argue that homo live in an illusory humanness of our own that we deliberate is reality when we real atomic number 18 non. One pregnant idea they disagree on is their purposes on what is reality and what is equity.Platos speculation is mostly based on his cave simile where he explains humans conditions. I willing explain the similarities and differences between Plato and Nietzsche by means of the cave allegory. Starting from a base point, Plato and Nietzsche both state that in that respe ct ar deceptions and illusions in the gentleman. First, agree to the cave allegory by Plato, he believes the shadows(Plato 64) to be whats keeping us from utilizing our turn inledge to its fullest value. The shadows be metaphors that represent our acts of relying on our senses to bring up objects in life.They be just now the appearances of the actual objects, centre that we ar not pee-peeting the genuine concept that is concealed by the appearances. He explains that the objects humans see in the visible(a) world ar far from the truth and their honest forms. On the contrary, Nietzsche does not believe that the shadows atomic number 18 actually what Plato says they are. Although Nietzsche does believe that in that location are illusions in the world that humans are parkly deceived by, he argues that what deceives us in the world is our diction and not the appearances of objects.He explains that concepts are the main cause that deceives humans because a concept is pr oduced by over construeing what is individual and real(Nietzsche 878). And this is where language part comes in. The language helps creating concepts to objects, making it harder for humans to cut across the original entities (Nietzsche 877) of the objects. Words are only metaphors of things (Nietzsche 877) to identify them but nothing more. Words do not hold any(prenominal) meanings or the true center field of the objects. The only purpose of words is so that humans can agree on the same things and get things done create consistency in our lives. In terms of ruth in objects, Plato believes that once humans are out the cave we will be able to see the truth in things and know logic and reasoning. He argues that the only way to travelling bag the real meanings of objects is to rationalize everything and not rely on our senses (Plato 66). If all humans use logic to describe everything and not guess what they would represent, then we would all be in the diaphanous realm. On the ot her hand, Nietzsche has a very different take on the qualified enumerate of truth. In fact, he argues that there are nothing more real than things that visibly and physically outlast in the world things that are accessible.This is wherefore he does not believe in the intelligible realm or the real reality. He believes that we are already in reality. His main case is that those things that exist in the world know neither forms nor concepts. (Nietzsche 878) and consequently there is no reality, meanings, concepts or even so truth within these objects. Nietzsche believes that the only truth existing in our lives is the agreement finished language. We have put labels and titles on objects so that we would be able to agree upon identifying those objects without any conflicts or disagreement. Steven Wallace delivers a similar point through his poem, Metaphors of a Magnifico.The basic summary of this poem is that there are Twenty men crossbreeding a yoke/ Into a village (Stevens) and the speaker, Stevens or the Magnifico, is act to date the meaning behind these twenty get over the bridge. The problem that Stevens had was the words that were used by individual else to describe the twenty men. These twenty men could be perceived as twenty men hybridisation twenty bridges for each man could develop crossover the bridge very differently. It can withal be seen as one man crossing the bridge if they all had the same purpose of why they are crossing the bridge. Ultimately, these men will look like one single man.Stevens could not find the true meaning of his own behind these other peoples descriptions of the twenty men. He starts using words like white wall and fruit-trees to pick up the real meaning of these men crossing the bridge but no matter how hard he tries the meaning escapes(Stevens). This poem perfectly supports Nietzsches theory in the sense that, words are only metaphors to describe objects. Words cannot hold concepts for objects do not have re al meanings behind them. After all, Stevens and even Nietzsche would say that it is simply Twenty men crossing a bridge/ Into a village with no concepts attached.Going back to the cave allegory, Plato says that humans think the shadows are the truth behind the objects when they are only appearances. at a time if Nietzsche would critique the allegory he would find reliable things accurate and other things to be false. One thing he would agree upon is the deception that humans are getting. One big idea on the allegory that Nietzsche would definitely disagree on is the outside world or the intelligible realm for he does not believe that we are not living in reality skillful now.He does not believe that we are in the cave. If Nietzsche would roughly create an allegory for his look out on the world and human conditions he would beginning(a) scrap the whole idea of being in the cave and the outside world. In Nietzsches allegory, there is a group of men freely rest outside in nature. And everything in nature is tagged with a card on them trees, flowers, grass and so on. As each of the men looks at these objects, they will see the same objects but different kinky shadows.These men, thinking that there are more meanings and concepts beyond theses words on the cards, will have different shapes of the shadows in their heads, due to different perceptions. However in reality, the shadows of the objects will flawlessly match the shapes of the actual objects, meaning that what you see is what you get there are no hidden concepts. Although Plato and Nietzsche may have differences on the matter of truth, they are able to find a common ground between their theories it is that humans could not be living deeper in an illusory world right now.